On a popular hypothesis that suggests superiority of males over females in spatial navigation is a result of natural selection, a new study has raised question.
Some evolutionary psychologists argue that males' slight, but significant, superiority in spatial navigation over females - a phenomenon demonstrated repeatedly in many species, including humans - is probably "adaptive," meaning that over the course of evolutionary history the trait gave males an advantage that led them to have more offspring than their peers.
AdvertisementBut a new analysis, led by University of Illinois psychology professor Justin Rhodes, found no support for this hypothesis.
The researchers looked at 35 studies that included data about the territorial ranges and spatial abilities of 11 species of animals: cuttlefish, deer mice, horses, humans, laboratory mice, meadow voles, pine voles, prairie voles, rats, rhesus macaques and talastuco-tucos (a type of burrowing rodent).
Rhodes and his colleagues found that in eight out of 11 species, males demonstrated moderately superior spatial skills to their female counterparts, regardless of the size of their territories or the extent to which males ranged farther than females of the same species.
The findings lend support to an often-overlooked hypothesis, Rhodes said. The average superiority of males over females in spatial navigation may just be a "side effect" of testosterone, he said.
Previous studies have shown that women who take testosterone tend to see an improvement in their spatial navigation skills, he said.
Researchers tend to overlook the fact that many physical and behavioral traits arise as a consequence of random events, or are simply side effects of other changes that offer real evolutionary advantages, he said.
"For example, women have nipples because it's an adaptation; it promotes the survival of their offspring. Men get it because it doesn't harm them. So if we see something that's advantageous for one sex, the other sex will get it because it's inheriting the same genes - unless it's bad for that sex," Rhodes said.
Similarly, scientists who claim that the different spatial skills in men and women are adaptive must explain why women failed to inherit the superior spatial skills of their navigationally enhanced fathers, he said.
"The only way you will get a sex difference (in an adaptive trait) is where a trait is good for one sex and bad for the other. But how is navigation bad for women? This is a flaw in the logic," he added.
Their research results have been published in The Quarterly Review of Biology.