Optimal Treatment for Most Common Infection After Organ Transplantation Revealed

by Sheela Philomena on  August 25, 2012 at 10:09 AM Organ Donation News
RSS Email Print This Page Comment bookmark
Font : A-A+

According to a recent study, waiting to treat the commonest viral infections in transplant recipients until they reach a certain threshold is better than prophylactically treating all recipients.
 Optimal Treatment for Most Common Infection After Organ Transplantation Revealed
Optimal Treatment for Most Common Infection After Organ Transplantation Revealed

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common infection in organ transplant recipients, who are susceptible to infections in general because they must take immunosuppressive medications long term. CMV infections can cause increased risks of other infections, organ rejection, heart complications, and diabetes.

The two main strategies against CMV are called universal antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy. In universal prophylaxis all patients at risk are given antiviral drugs (such as valganciclovir, valacyclovir, and ganciclovir) for several months after transplantation. In pre-emptive therapy, patients are intensively monitored for CMV activity by sensitive laboratory methods, and short-term antiviral treatment is given only to those with significant viral counts before symptoms occur.

To compare these strategies, Tomas Reischig, MD, PhD (Charles University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, in Pilsen, Czech Republic) and his colleagues assigned kidney transplant recipients—who either had CMV present in their blood or who received transplants from donors with CMV in their blood—to either three months of prophylaxis with valacyclovir or pre-emptive valganciclovir given when significant CMV counts were detected.

Among the major findings for 55 patients after three years:

  • CMV disease developed in 6% of patients in the pre-emptive therapy group and in 9% receivin prophylaxis
  • Patients in the prophylaxis group were 2.5 times more likely to develop moderate-to-severe kidney scaring and atrophy than patients receiving pre-emptive therapy.
  • Kidney biopsies showed that the prophylaxis group also had significantly higher expression of genes involved in kidney scaring.
  • The occurrence of CMV was similar in both groups, but pre-emptive therapy improved 4-year survival of transplanted organs (92% vs 74%).


These findings indicate that compared with valacyclovir prophylaxis, pre-emptive valganciclovir therapy for CMV may lead to less severe kidney scaring and atrophy and to significantly better survival of transplanted organs.

"In the view of short-term trial results, which favor CMV prophylaxis over pre-emptive strategy because of lower risk of acute rejection, we expected a translation of presumed benefit of prophylaxis to the long-term post-transplant period. In fact, we discovered that the opposite is true," said Dr. Reischig.

Source: Eurekalert

Post a Comment

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
Notify me when reply is posted
I agree to the terms and conditions

More News on:

Tongue Abnormalities Flu Transplantation Organ Donation and Transplantation 

News A - Z

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

News Search

Medindia Newsletters

Subscribe to our Free Newsletters!

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Find a Doctor
Advertisement

Stay Connected

  • Available on the Android Market
  • Available on the App Store

Facebook

News Category

News Archive