Mismatch Between Donor Funding Support and Global Health Needs

by Dr. Trupti Shirole on  July 14, 2015 at 4:13 PM General Health News   - G J E 4
Recently, the first in-depth assessment of how donor funding is spent on global versus country-specific functions of health appeared in The Lancet. It was revealed that only one-fifth of international health aid is targeted at pandemic preparedness, research for neglected diseases like Ebola, tackling drug-resistant bacteria, and other key global health issues. The study suggested the need for a new approach for classifying funding that reflects the functions that funding serves, rather than the specific disease or country.
 Mismatch Between Donor Funding Support and Global Health Needs
Mismatch Between Donor Funding Support and Global Health Needs

Marco SchAferhoff, associate director of SEEK Development in Berlin, Germany, said, "We should be investing in essential global functions, as these investments would benefit poor people wherever they live, including the poor within middle-income countries. Countries like China and India would substantially benefit from market shaping to lower drug prices and increased international efforts to control multi-drug resistance tuberculosis."

Just 21% of this funding in 2013 was devoted to global functions providing global public goods and providing global leadership and stewardship. In contrast, 79% was disbursed for individual county support, estimated the study. The study also highlighted the mismatch between donor support and global health needs. Thus, the entire donor investment in cross-border externalities was around $1 billion in 2013, less than a third of what the World Bank estimated the annual cost of building a pandemic preparedness system ($3.4 billion).

Spending in 2013 for all global public goods (around $3 billion) was less than half the annual $6 billion that World Health Organization estimates is needed to support research and development for neglected diseases alone. Co-author Lawrence Summers, former US treasury secretary and professor of economics at the Harvard University said, "The best way for donors to improve the health of poor people in middle-income countries is to invest in research and development for neglected diseases, pandemic preparedness, and other global functions of health."

Source: IANS

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

More News on: