Low Birth Rates can Actually Pay Off in the US and Other Countries

by Kathy Jones on  October 10, 2014 at 6:27 PM General Health News
RSS Email Print This Page Comment
Font : A-A+

It actually pays to have fewer children, a global study from the University of California, Berkeley, and the East-West Center in Hawaii suggests.

The results challenge previous assumptions about population growth.
 Low Birth Rates can Actually Pay Off in the US and Other Countries
Low Birth Rates can Actually Pay Off in the US and Other Countries

Researchers in 40 countries correlated birth rates with economic data and concluded that a moderately low birth rate - a little below two children per woman - can actually boost a country's overall standard of living. While governments generally favor higher birth rates to maintain the workforce and tax base needed to fund pensions, health care and other benefits for the elderly, it is typically families that bear the brunt of the cost of having children, the study found.

"Higher fertility imposes large costs on families because it is they, rather than governments, that bear most of the costs of raising children. Also, a growing labor force has to be provided with costly capital such as factories, office buildings, transportation and housing," said UC Berkeley demographer Ronald Lee, an author of the far-reaching study to be published Oct. 10 in the journal, Science.

"Instead of trying to get people to have more children, governments should adjust their policies to accommodate inevitable population aging," added Lee, who co-authored the report, "Is low fertility really a problem? Population aging, dependency, and consumption," with Andrew Mason, an economist and senior fellow at the East-West Center. Lee, Mason and fellow researchers compared government and private spending among all age groups using the National Transfer Accounts project, which studies how population changes impact economies across generations, and which they co-direct.

Their calculations were based on finding the birth rate and age distribution that would best balance the costs of raising children and of caring for the elderly. For example, they found that the U.S. birth rate is close to ideal for government budgetary needs, but that in parts of Europe and East Asia, average fertility rates are so low that they reduce living standards when public and private costs are included.

"A more complete accounting of the costs of children shows only a few countries in East Asia and Europe where the governments should encourage people to have more children," said Mason, an economics professor at the University of Hawaii-Manoa. "In the United States and many other high- and middle-income countries, people are having about the number of kids that are best for overall standards of living."

Source: Eurekalert

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted
I agree to the terms and conditions

News A - Z


News Search

Medindia Newsletters

Subscribe to our Free Newsletters!

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

  • Available on the Android Market
  • Available on the App Store


News Category

News Archive