Medindia

X

Do Positive Catheter Cultures Predict Subsequent Bloodstream Infection?

by Dr. Reeja Tharu on  June 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM Health Watch   - G J E 4
A retrospective cohort study was carried out during the period between September 2000 and December 2007 to determine the role of positive Catheter Cultures (PCC) in predicting subsequent blood stream infections.
 Do Positive Catheter Cultures Predict Subsequent Bloodstream Infection?
Do Positive Catheter Cultures Predict Subsequent Bloodstream Infection?
Advertisement

The setting was an ICU, with nine beds, at the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Advertisement
PCC was defined by a quantitative culture of a swab from the catheter's distal tip that yielded ≥103 colony-forming units/Ml.

'Subsequent BSI' was a reference to the identification of the causative microorganism of the PCC, in the culture of the peripheral blood of the patient taken between day 3 and day 30 after catheter removal.

Numerous studies done earlier on ICU patients, have evaluated the diagnostic significance and accuracy of the positive catheter culture (PCC) in detecting subsequent blood stream infection (BSI) from catheters. These studies indicate that a PCC may be considered as a warning signal.

A total of 138 isolated PCCs yielding 149 selected pathogenic microorganisms inserted in 109 patients were studied.

Arterial, venous, and dialysis catheters, that were inserted for 24 hrs and later removed in ICU patients who survived >48 hrs after catheter removal, were considered for the study.

As a routine, all the catheters removed in the ICU were routinely sent to the department of bacteriology and the details are recorded.

Catheters with isolated PCCs yielding selected pathogenic microorganisms were included in the study.

Selected pathogenic microorganisms include Gram-positive cocci such as Streptococcus spp., S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, and Enterococci and also Gram-negative rods such as Haemophilus influenzae, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida spp.

Data was collected from the records of all ICU patients whose catheters were study samples. Positive blood cultures were singled out from the bacteriology record.

Antimicrobial catheters are not employed in this ICU.

Antibiotic (AB) treatment was usually on the day of catheter removal and also within 48 hrs before and after removal. To what extent it affected the subsequent BSI is not easily discernable.

Results & Conclusion

The study found that isolated PCC is associated with a low risk of developing subsequent BSI within the 30 days of hospital convalescence after catheter removal.

The results of similar studies vary widely due to discrepancies in population, study design, in the causative organisms, indwelling duration, in the AB used in treatment.

To some extent the causative organism played a role in bringing about subsequent blood infection. For example S.aureus and candida were more involved in infections.

The study also suggests that in patients with such isolated PCC antibiotics must not be systematically administered as a measure to stop a possible subsequent BSI.

Reference:

Medscape

Critical Care Medicine 2011.

Source: Medindia
Advertisement

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

Advertisement
View All