Community Intervention in Reducing Alcohol Consumption Does Not Help Reduce Problem Drinking

by Kathy Jones on  March 13, 2014 at 9:49 PM Alcohol & Drug Abuse News   - G J E 4
Researchers led by Anthony Shakeshaft at National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre at UNSW (University of New South Wales) observed -related crime, road-traffic crashes, and hospital inpatient admissions between different communities and found that implementing community-based interventions alone were not effective in reducing most alcohol-related harms and risky alcohol consumption, a new study published in PLOS Medicine reveals.
 Community Intervention in Reducing Alcohol Consumption Does Not Help Reduce Problem Drinking
Community Intervention in Reducing Alcohol Consumption Does Not Help Reduce Problem Drinking

The researchers reached these conclusions by conducting a five year cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 20 communities in New South Wales. They quantified the effectiveness of 13 community-based interventions using routinely collected data on alcohol-related harms, and a survey of drinking habits and experiences of alcohol-related harm. Interventions included school and work-based education and training, media messaging on harms, screening and brief advice in general practice, pharmacies and hospital emergency departments, and targeting high risk individuals and high risk times.

After implementation of the interventions, the rates of alcohol-related crime, road-traffic crashes, hospital admissions, risky alcohol consumption, and problem drinking were not statistically significantly different between the 10 communities that implemented the interventions and the 10 control communities, although there may have been limited power to detect a difference and uptake for some of the interventions was not consistent across all communities. The researchers did observe that following the interventions, individuals in the intervention communities reported statistically significantly lower average weekly consumption of alcohol than those in the control communities (20% lower, equivalent to 1.9 fewer standard drinks per week per respondent) and alcohol-related verbal abuse. However, these findings must be interpreted cautiously because they are based on low survey response rates.

The authors say: "This RCT provides little evidence that community action significantly reduces risky alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms, other than potential reductions in self-reported average weekly consumption and experience of alcohol-related verbal abuse."
Source: Eurekalert

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like