Medindia

X

Cancer Survival Rates Vary Significantly Among Some Countries

by Kathy Jones on  November 27, 2014 at 8:27 PM Cancer News   - G J E 4
The biggest global study comparing the cancer survival rates has found a dramatic gulf in the survival rates between different countries.
 Cancer Survival Rates Vary Significantly Among Some Countries
Cancer Survival Rates Vary Significantly Among Some Countries
Advertisement

The CONCORD-2 study reports 5-year survival estimates for 25.7 million cancer patients diagnosed with one of 10 common cancers and 75 000 children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia between 1995 and 2009, using individual patient data from 279 cancer registries in 67 countries.

Advertisement
Even after researchers had adjusted for differences between countries and regions in the risk of death from other causes by age, sex, and race, and over time, they found very large variations between countries in survival for specific cancers.

In particular, the striking gap in 5-year survival with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children, ranging from 16-50 percent surviving 5 years from diagnosis in Jordan, Lesotho, Tunisia (central), Indonesia (Jakarta), and Mongolia to over 90 percent in Canada, Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Norway, indicates major deficiencies in the management of this largely curable disease, which is also the most common childhood cancer.

Liver and lung cancer have the worst prognosis among the 10 cancers examined, with 5-year survival of less than 20 percent in both developed and developing countries, suggesting that most patients still go to see their doctors too late for treatment to be effective.

For example, although 5-year lung cancer survival increased by up to 10 percent over the period of the study in China, Israel, Japan, and Korea, with smaller increases in Colombia, North America, and in 17 European countries, it remains very poor (less than 10 percent) in some parts of Europe, including the UK.

The analysis shows that 5-year survival from breast and colorectal cancers has increased in most developed countries and in South America (Brazil, Colombia, and Ecuador). These trends are likely to reflect earlier diagnosis and better treatments such as pre-operative radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

The highest survival for these cancers can be seen in Israel and Ecuador (colon cancer; 68 percent or more); Qatar, Cyprus, and Iceland (rectal cancer; 70 percent or more); and Australia, Brazil, Canada, Cyprus, Israel, Japan, the USA, and several European countries (breast cancer; 85 percent or more).

Mongolia had by far the lowest survival for all three cancers. Within Europe, Iceland has the highest survival for colon and rectal cancer, with 65 percent and 77 percent 5-year survival respectively (2005-2009), while France and Finland have among the highest levels of survival for breast cancer (87 percent). Russia has the lowest survival for all three cancers.

Stomach cancer survival is higher in south-east Asia (Japan, 54 percent; Korea, 58 percent; Taiwan, 36 percent) than in other regions, and this is likely to reflect intensive diagnostic activity, early stage at diagnosis, and radical surgery, suggesting that important lessons could be learnt from these countries about diagnosis and treatment. Within Europe, 5-year survival in Denmark, Malta, Poland, and the UK (18-19 percent) remains lower than in most other European countries (see table 4).

Cervical and ovarian cancers show particularly wide differences in survival, and overall improvements have been slight. For example, 5-year survival with cervical cancer varies from a high of over 70 percent in Mauritius, Korea, Taiwan, Iceland, and Norway to less than 40 percent in Libya. Within Europe, cervical cancer survival is 60 percent or less in the UK, France, Ireland, Latvia, and four eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Poland, Russia, and Slovakia), with very little improvement seen over the past 15 years.

According to Dr Claudia Allemani, Senior Lecturer in Cancer Epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, there should not be such a dramatic gulf in survival in the 21st century, the majority of the variability in survival was probably due to factors that can be changed, such as the availability and quality of diagnostic and treatment services.

The study is published in The Lancet.

Source: ANI
Advertisement

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

Advertisement
View All