Breast MRI 'Better Than Clinical Approach for Predicting Chemotherapy's Efficiency'

According to a new study, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides an indication of a breast tumor's response to pre-surgical chemotherapy considerably earlier than possible through clinical examination.

Women with breast cancer often undergo chemotherapy before the surgery.

About Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI)
Encyclopedia section of medindia gives general info about Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Research has revealed that women who receive this treatment, known as 'neoadjuvant chemotherapy', are more likely to achieve breast conservation than those receiving chemotherapy after surgery.

Clinicians have tracked a patient's response to 'neoadjuvant chemotherapy' through clinical measurements of the tumor's size and location.

Contrast-enhanced MRI, also known as Magnetic resonance imaging, offers a promising alternative to the clinical approach through its ability to detect blood vessel formation in tumors, known as angiogenesis.

Osteochondritis Dissecans-Causes-Risk Factors-Symptoms-Diagnosis-Treatment-FAQs
Osteochondritis dissecans is a relatively rare condition. It is an important cause of joint pain in physically active adolescents.

Angiogenesis is an earlier and more exact marker of tumor response.

"MRI was better than the clinical approach for predicting which patients would go on to have complete tumor response," said Nola M. Hylton, Ph.D., professor of radiology and biomedical imaging at the University of California in San Francisco.

CMR Versus SPECT: Which is Better?
Cardiac MRI is more sensitive than SPECT in diagnosing cardiac problems, according to a recent study.

"It gave us great information on early response to treatment," she said.

For the study, researchers analyzed data from 'ACRIN 6657', the imaging component of the multicenter I-SPY TRIAL (Investigation of Serial Studies to Predict Your Therapeutic Response with Imaging And moLecular Analysis) breast cancer trial.

Does Routine Imaging in Low Back Pain - Do More Harm Than Good?
Routine imaging does not seem to improve clinical outcomes and exposes patients to unnecessary harms.

They compared MRI and clinical assessment of 216 female patients ranging between the age from 26 to 68 years undergoing 'neoadjuvant chemotherapy' for stage II or III breast cancer.

MRI sessions were performed before, during and after administration of a chemotherapy treatment.

The researchers then correlated imaging results with subsequent laboratory analysis of surgical samples.

Researchers discovered that MRI size measurements were superior to clinical examination at all time points, with tumor volume change showing the greatest relative benefit at the second MRI exam.

Moreover, MRI was better than the clinical assessment in predicting both complete tumor response and residual cancer burden.

The study reveals that how imaging can play a vital role in characterizing a tumor and monitoring treatment response.

"What we see on imaging helps us define not just the size of the tumor but its biological activity," Hylton said.

"We can observe if the signal increases after contrast injection, and interpret that increase as angiogenic activity. We can also use water diffusion measurements with MRI to provide an indirect reflection of the density of the cells," she added.

Besides this, Hylton and colleagues are currently assessing I-SPY data to see if MRI is better for predicting the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence.

This study has been published online in the journal Radiology.

Source-ANI