Wireless Systems can Damage Medical Equipment in Hospitals

by Gopalan on  June 26, 2008 at 11:49 AM Hospital News   - G J E 4
 Wireless Systems can Damage Medical Equipment in Hospitals
Wireless systems could cause potentially deadly breakdowns in lifesaving devices such as breathing and dialysis machines.

Many hospitals use wireless systems to keep track of medical equipment, but there are problems, researchers warned Tuesday and suggested safety tests to avoid major breakdowns.

The wireless systems, used to keep track of medical equipment, send out radio waves that can damage respirators, external pacemakers and kidney dialysis machines, according to a Dutch study.

Researchers discovered the problem in 123 tests they performed in an intensive-care unit at an Amsterdam hospital. Patients were not using the equipment at the time.

Electromagnetic glitches occurred in almost 30 per cent of the tests when microchip devices similar to those in many types of wireless medical equipment were placed within about 30 centimetres of the lifesaving machines.

A U.S. patient-safety expert said the study "is of urgent significance" and said hospitals should respond immediately to the "disturbing" results.

Nearly 20 per cent of the cases involved hazardous malfunctions that would probably harm patients. These included breathing machines that switched off; mechanical syringe pumps that stopped delivering medication and external pacemakers, which regulate the heart, that malfunctioned, news agency AP reported.

The wireless systems are used to tag and keep track of medical equipment like heart-testing machines, joint replacements and surgical staplers. They can help quickly locate devices that are elsewhere in the hospital and help prevent theft.

The technology also is viewed as a way to prevent drug counterfeiting, by embedding microchips in drug containers, and to prevent harmful medical errors by keeping tabs on devices used during surgery.

The results show that it's crucial for hospitals to test their wireless items before using them around equipment essential for keeping patients alive, said Dr. Erik Jan van Lieshout, a study co-author and critical care specialist at the University of Amsterdam's Academic Medical Center.

His study appears in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.

"Attention must be paid to these disturbing findings," Dr. Donald Berwick, president of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, said in an editorial in the journal.

"It seems that hospitals, regulators and manufacturers certainly have some immediate work to do," including examining whether similar problems are occurring in hospital critical care units, Berwick said.

Peper Long, a spokeswoman for the Food and Drug Administration, said the agency is aware of the potential problem but has not received any reports of injuries directly caused by electronic interference with hospital medical devices.

She said the FDA is testing some medical devices to "determine their vulnerability and to what extent such vulnerability may be a public health concern."

A previous Dutch study had suggested mobile phones be kept one metre away from the critical care bedside.

It also called for more study into critical care equipment and its compatibility with new wireless telecommunication technologies that are increasingly being used by hospital patients.

"It is absolutely an issue, but you have to manage around it," said Dr. John Halamka, chief information officer at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.

Beth Israel uses the technology for identification and tracking purposes, including microchips embedded in intravenous pumps and ventilators.

Halamka said the devices are compatible with the hospital's wireless network and that all new machines are evaluated before being used near other electronic medical devices. He said there have been no examples of harmful interference at Beth Israel.

The JAMA editorial said hospitals should consider surveillance for interference problems that employees haven't noticed or reported. Regulatory agencies also should determine if new safety guidance is needed, the editorial recommended.

Source: Medindia

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

View All