US AIDS Clinics Ban Merck Reps Over Drug Costs

by Rajshri on  January 26, 2010 at 7:41 PM AIDS/HIV News   - G J E 4
Merck Pharmaceuticals has been accused of of price-gouging its AIDS treatment Isentress by the largest US HIV/AIDS health care provider, which has banned the drug giant's sales reps from its clinics in protest.
 US AIDS Clinics Ban Merck Reps Over Drug Costs
US AIDS Clinics Ban Merck Reps Over Drug Costs

"We've banned representatives from Merck Pharmaceuticals from calling on our physicians in our clinics, which is a common marketing strategy. We are instituting this ban largely because of the egregious pricing policies for their key AIDS drug, Isentress," Ged Kinslea, communications director for the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF), told AFP.

"The drug is a good drug, it has fewer side effects... but it is the single most expensive first-line anti-retroviral treatment for AIDS available in the United States and the developing world," said Kinslea.

An annual course of Isentress costs in the region of 12,870 dollars in the United States, according to AHF.

In Africa, the continent the worst-hit by the global AIDS pandemic, Isentress costs "about 1,100 US dollars per patient, per year and that's about 20 times more than other AIDS drugs in Africa," said Kinslea.

Isentress was brought to market in the United States in 2007 as a so-called salvage therapy drug -- a treatment for patients for whom other AIDS therapies have not worked or who only sought treatment in the late stages of illness, AHF said.

Last year, the US Food and Drug Administration approved Isentress as a first-line treatment for AIDS, "but the pricing remains at the expensive, salvage-therapy price," said Kinslea.

In the United States, salvage therapy patients account for between 50,000 and 80,000 of the 1.1 million people thought to be HIV positive.

Because the market for salvage therapy is just a fraction of the overall AIDS treatment market, pharmaceutical companies sell their last-chance drugs for a higher price than so-called first line treatments.

When Merck was contacted about the price-gouging accusations, a media representative referred AFP to a statement issued by the company two weeks ago.

In the statement, Merck said AHF's accusations were false, and insisted it had priced Isentress "responsibly ... after consultation with respected leaders in the HIV community."

Source: AFP

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions
I think it is about time that someone ban these practices. All of these life-saving drugs are overpriced, definitely in America. We want health care reform, but they have so much money to fight any kind of real reform because of their unfair practices. If we could stop these companies from doing these ridiculous things it would help everyone. A years worth of Atripla in America costs around $14,400, so this is not the first medication which has outrageous costs.
Pozitivity Tuesday, January 26, 2010

You May Also Like

View All