TV medical dramas, chasing TRP ratings, sensationalize and take many liberties with truth, it is known. A recent analysis found them "rife" with ethical dilemmas and actions that often ran afoul of professional codes of conduct.
A medical student and faculty directors from the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, US analyzed depictions of bioethical issues and professionalism over a full season of two popular medical dramas -- "Grey's Anatomy" and "House, M.D." They were not stating the obvious, but trying to provide hard data on what is actually happening on the small screen. The findings have been published in the April issue of the
Journal of Medical Ethics. "I think the utility in our study is that it provides a starting point for a discussion," says fourth-year medical student Matthew Czarny, a researcher at the Berman Institute. "In no way are we saying that these shows are educational in and of themselves."
An earlier analysis by the co-authors, along with fellow Berman Institute faculty member Marie Nolan, Ph.D., found that more than 80 percent of medical and nursing students watch television medical dramas. That study also concluded that the programs may prompt students to think and talk about bioethical issues.
In analyzing the second seasons of "Grey's Anatomy" and "House," Czarny counted 179 depictions of bioethical issues, under 11 different topics, ranging from informed consent to organ-transplant eligibility to human experimentation.