Sunscreens in the Sky may Be Ineffective in Controlling Global Warming

by VR Sreeraman on  July 9, 2008 at 4:05 PM Environmental Health   - G J E 4
 Sunscreens in the Sky may Be Ineffective in Controlling Global Warming
A new study has determined that a proposal to reverse climate change by placing mirrors in the sky to reflect sunlight away from Earth would be useless in combating global warming.

According to a report in Discovery News, this solution would not give us back the same climate we had before we started emitting so much carbon dioxide (CO2).

The study, carried out by researchers at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom, involved the application of state-of-the-art global climate models to predict the effect of using reflective sunshades to send a fraction of the sunlight that enters Earth's atmosphere back into space before it can heat things up.

They compared two futures with four times the pre-industrial level of CO2: one where nothing was done, and another where the sunlight intensity was reduced to a level that achieved the lower, pre-industrial global average temperature, despite the higher CO2 levels.

The second case simulated the use of enough sunshades to drop the average temperature to pre-industrial levels, which turned out to be a reduction in sunlight of about 4.2 percent.

"Although we managed to cancel out warming on a global average, what you end up with is some areas that warm up and some that cool down," said Dan Lunt, who led the study.

"We found warming in the Arctic and Antarctic regions, and a cooling in the equatorial regions," said Lunt. "We got a decrease in rainfall a lot of places in the world, decreases in sea ice, and some changes in the El Nino phenomenon," he added.

These changes resulted because the mirrors reduce sunlight more at the equators than near the poles, while CO2 has a warming effect that' more equally distributed, according to Lunt.

The sunshades also do nothing to prevent changes caused by increased CO2, such as ocean acidification or changes to plant growth.

According to climatologist Alan Robock of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J., "he biggest problem I have with geoengineering discussions now is that the prospect of it working will reduce efforts to mitigate the problem by reducing fossil fuel emissions."

"Te solution to the climate problem is mitigation, not geoengineering. These things are not perfect and there' the potential for unintended consequences," he added.

Source: ANI

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

View All