Second-Hand Smoking Is Bad For Pets

by Aruna on  February 10, 2009 at 4:43 PM Environmental Health   - G J E 4
People who refuse to quit smoking even though they know it could damage their health may kick the habit if they believe it could harm their pet, according to an unusual study published on Tuesday.
 Second-Hand Smoking Is Bad For Pets
Second-Hand Smoking Is Bad For Pets

US researchers asked adult pet owners who lived with dogs, cats or birds in an area of southeastern Michigan to respond to an Internet survey on smoking behavior. A total of 3,293 replied.

Of these, 21 percent were current smokers, smoking an average of 13 and a half cigarettes a day, about half of them in the home. Another 27 percent lived with at least one smoker.

Nearly one in three of the smokers (28.4 percent) said that if they knew that second-hand smoke was bad for their pets, they would give up tobacco.

By comparison, among the non-smokers who lived with a smoker, only 16.4 percent said they would ask their partner to quit if their pet were at risk.

The paper says there is a mound of evidence that passive smoking is as bad for household animals as it is for humans, but many smoking pet-owners are unaware of this risk.

"Educational campaigns informing pet owners of the risks of (second-hand smoke) exposure for pets could motivate some owners to quit smoking," the study suggests hopefully.

"It could also motivate these owners who cohabit with smokers make their homes smoke-free."

The study, published in the British journal 'Tobacco Control', is led by Sharon Milberger of the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Michigan.

Source: AFP

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions
The real issue is ANTI-SMOKER SCIENTIFIC FRAUD! More than 50 studies show that human papillomaviruses cause over ten times more lung cancers than they pretend are caused by secondhand smoke. Anti-smoker studies are all based on nothing but lifestyle questionnaires, so they've been cynically DESIGNED to falsely blame passive smoking for all those extra lung cancers that are really caused by HPV and they commit the same type of fraud with animals.They ignore other evidence that proves they're lying, such as the death rates from asthma doubling since their movement began.And it's a lie that passive smoking causes heart disease. AMI deaths in Pueblo actually ROSE the year after the smoking ban. The government has no right to restrict peoples' liberty without a compelling justification. The anti-smokers have no such justification, so THEY COMMITTED SCIENTIFIC FRAUD TO DECEIVE THE PUBLIC.

CarolT Thursday, February 12, 2009

You May Also Like

View All