Recent profit announcements from Australian mining majors are not good news for everyone.
With sustained record high commodity prices, more and more mining companies are scouring the world seeking their fortunes in Asia, the Pacific, Latin America and Africa. Investors and the Australian Treasury, which announced a massive federal budget surplus last week due, in part, to Australian mining tax revenues, welcome this, though. Many, no doubt, benefit from the mining boom. Yet, for some of the communities in developing countries in which some less reputable mining companies operate, it's clear they suffer under the so-called "resource curse".
AdvertisementMany communities have had their environments destroyed as a result of mining companies who, having abandoned the environmental standards of their home countries, have polluted rivers and oceans with heavy metals such as lead and mercury. Placer Dome (now Barrick Gold Corporation), poisoned the waterways of Marinduque island in the Philippines, offered inadequate compensation and then shut up shop absolving itself of any further responsibility. Such dismal corporate behavior can rob people of livelihoods, inflame poverty and ride rough shod over people's human rights.
A first line of defence for irresponsible companies is that they merely operate under the laws of the host country. However, many of the developing countries in which mining companies increasingly operate have both weak laws governing mining standards and limited capacity to enforce the law. The result is often little or no respect for the rights of affected communities. One solution to such poor practice would be to create an independent Mining Ombudsman to look into overseas cases where the Australian mining sector has acted irresponsibly. This is neither a new nor radical idea.
Many Australian industries are subject to the investigations of an ombudsman such as the telecommunications, banking and financial as well as energy and water sectors. These complaints systems ensure that people adversely affected by these industries have a means of redress and can protect their rights. To date, people of local communities whose basic human rights are impacted by the Australian mining industry have not been afforded such protection.
In the absence of an official complaints mechanism accessible by these communities, Oxfam Australia established a Mining Ombudsman to investigate complaints of human rights abuses. The Mining Ombudsman has documented the impacts of mines on local communities in developing countries and the findings demonstrate the need for an independent grievance process.
Moreover, the Ombudsman model has demonstrated the benefits of a complaints mechanism capable of assisting corporate-community collaboration in remote areas where Government services are often practically absent. In this age of massive resource wealth the Australian mining industry and the Government can certainly afford it.