Measures Taken to Tackle Malaria Could Turn Out to be Counter-productive

An international team of researchers said that the measures taken to tackle malaria may not meet its desired objective.

A new report in the Lancet has suggested some countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, might be better pursuing a policy of controlling the disease, reports the BBC.

About Malaria
Encyclopedia section of medindia gives general information about About Malaria Causes

They have also criticised the World Health Organization (WHO) for not providing adequate direction.

However, WHO spokesman said beating malaria must remain the ultimate goal.

The report has pointed out, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation set the world such a target in 2007, an aim which was then endorsed by the WHO's Margaret Chan.

About Mosquito Diseases
Mosquito-borne diseases, like malaria, filaria, dengue, etc are common in places conducive of mosquito breeding. Swamps, ponds and stagnated drainage provide optimal breeding ground for mosquitoes.

The series of articles have instead urged a pragmatic approach in which efforts and resources are concentrated on shrinking the global area where malaria still prevails.

It suggested some countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, may be better pursuing a policy of controlling the disease rather than one of eradication.

Latin America Best Placed For Eradicating Malaria
Latin America has the best chances of any malaria-affected continent of wiping out the disease, while sub-Saharan Africa has the least hope, according to a study published on Friday in The Lancet.

The report's authors include Professor Richard Feacham of University of California's Global Health Group and researchers from the Clinton Health Access Initiative.

In an editorial accompanying the series, Richard Horton and Pamela Das of the Lancet, argued control may save more lives.

Malaria Control Turning Difficult With 'Evolving' Mosquito
Anopheles gambiae,the malaria-transmitting mosquito species, has begun to evolve into two separate species with different characteristics,which could pose a challenge to malaria control.

"If existing control efforts were indeed scaled up, by 2015, 1.14 million children's lives could be saved in sub-Saharan Africa alone. This finding is important. The quest for elimination must not distract existing good malaria control work," they wrote.

They also concluded "malaria will only be truly eradicable when an effective vaccine is fully available".

Responding to the report in a statement, Robert Newman, of the WHO's Global Malaria Programme, said the ultimate goal had to be eradication

"WHO has always supported - and will always continue to support - endemic countries in their efforts to control and eliminate malaria," he wrote.

"It is entirely feasible to eliminate malaria from countries and regions where the intensity of transmission is low to moderate, and where health systems are strong.

"Eliminating malaria from countries where the intensity of transmission is high and stable, such as in tropical Africa will require more potent tools and stronger health systems than are available today."

The authors pointed out that malaria and mosquitoes do not respect national borders and that both parasite and insect may develop resistance to existing drugs.

Source-ANI