IRDA Tells Insurers to Reject Claims Only on 'Valid Grounds'

by Lyju Kuruvilla on  October 18, 2011 at 3:44 PM Health Insurance News
RSS Email Print This Page Comment bookmark
Font : A-A+

You land up in a hospital on a medical emergency. The treatment costs a bomb. Your only solace is your medical insurance policy, which you have kept alive for 10 years - that too, without even making a claim - by paying annual premiums without fail. You file a claim to get the reimbursement of the hospitalization expenses. However, to your horror, the insurance company rejects the claim, citing technical reason.
 IRDA Tells Insurers to Reject Claims Only on 'Valid Grounds'
IRDA Tells Insurers to Reject Claims Only on 'Valid Grounds'

Such scenario is not unheard of in the health insurance sector. Consumer activist Jehangir Gai narrates such an incident where a policyholder's hospitalization claim was rejected because the insurer was intimated after the stipulated deadline. The fact that the policyholder was not in a position to intimate within the timeframe as he was hospitalized on an emergency and remained indisposed for a while failed to convince the insurance firm.

Explains Gai: "Sometimes, a person is admitted to hospital in an emergency (such as in the case of sudden appendicitis or heart attack) and his priority then is not to trace the policy document and intimate the insurance company. If a person forgets to inform the insurance company within the prescribed period (maximum seven days), then the claim is rejected even if it is submitted in time, within 30 days of discharge."

Then, there are cases where the claim-settlement process is stalled on the grounds that the original documents like discharge card, pathological test reports, X-rays, etc, were not submitted. "The original bills have to be submitted but not the documents, as these are required for subsequent follow-up treatment. There is no condition in a policy that requires the original reports to be handed over; just the copies would suffice. Yet, claims are rejected for non-submission of the original reports," he says.

In fact, so commonplace are cases of policyholders being dissatisfied with the insurers' claim-approval record that the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has had to issue a circular to life as well as health insurance companies asking them to refrain from repudiating genuine claims on the grounds that they are time-barred.

Source: Medindia

Post a Comment

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
Notify me when reply is posted
I agree to the terms and conditions

More News on:

Third Party Administrator for Claims and Cashless Health Insurance Critical Care Insurance 

News A - Z

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

News Search

Medindia Newsletters

Subscribe to our Free Newsletters!

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Find a Doctor

Stay Connected

  • Available on the Android Market
  • Available on the App Store

News Category

News Archive

Loading...