Did you know that heart attacks can give you mathematics? That statement appears on the web site of James Keener,who works in the mathematics of cardiology. This area has many problems that are ripe for unified attack by mathematicians,clinicians, and biomedical engineers. In an article to appear in the April 2011 issue of the Notices of the American Mathematical Society,John W. Cain, a mathematician at Virginia Commonwealth University, presents a survey of six ongoing Challenge Problems in mathematicalcardiology. Cain's article emphasizes cardiac electrophysiology, because some of the most exciting research problems in mathematicalcardiology involve electrical wave propagation in heart tissue.
At some point in our lives, many of us will undergo anelectrocardiogram (ECG), a recording of electrical activity in the heart. To understand where these tiny electrical currents originate, we must zoom in to the molecular level. Bodily fluids, such as blood,contain positively charged ions. When these ions traverse cellmembranes, they cause electrical currents, which in turn elicitchanges in the voltage V across the membrane. If a sufficiently strong stimulus current is applied to a sufficiently well-rested cell, then the cell experiences an "action potential": V suddenly spikes andremains elevated for a prolonged interval. These action potentialsgovern heartbeat patterns and are therefore critical to understandingand treating disorders like arrhythmia (abnormal heart rhythms) and inparticular tachycardia (faster than normal heart rhythms).
Taking the Nobel Prize-winning work of Hodgkin and Huxley as astarting point, researchers have created mathematical models of thecardiac action potential by viewing the cardiac cell membrane as anelectrical circuit. A major challenge that Cain identifies is striking a balance between feasiblity and complexity: Minimize complications in the model, so that it is amenable to mathematicalanalysis, but add sufficient detail, so that the model reproduces asmuch clinically relevant data as possible. The equations that govern the model---nonlinear partial differential equations---cannot be solved explicitly, and solutions must be obtained through approximation by numerical methods. Adding further complications are the intricate geometry of the heart, with its four chambers andconnections to veins and arteries, and the fact that different typesof cardiac tissue have different conduction properties.
Cain goes on to discuss various cardiac phenomena and the mathematics that can be used to describe them. One example is heart rhythm: The regular, coordinated contraction of the heart muscle that pumps blood through the body. Improving the understanding and treatment of irregularities in that rhythm is critical in the fight against heart disease.
A healthy heart does not beat in a perfectly regular pattern; in fact, such a pattern would be a sign of potentially serious pathologies.The body's autonomic nervous system uses neurotransmitters to speed up or slow down the heart, and tiny fluctuations in those substances induce variability in the intervals between consecutive beats. The RR interval is the interval between consecutive heartbeats measured in an ECG. Attempts to quantify heart rate variability (HRV) usually involve analyzing time series of RR intervals.
Unfortunately, some ways of analyzing RR time series give the same results for patients with healthy hearts and for those with fatal cardiac abnormalities. One challenge for mathematicians and statisticians is to devise quantitative methods for distinguishing between the RR time series of people with healthy hearts and the RR time series of those with cardiac pathologies. Cain asks: Can some pathologies be diagnosed solely by analysis of RR time series and, if so, which ones? To spot subtle pathologies, methods are needed for quantifying the "regularity" of a cardiac rhythm. Also, given the existing array of diagnostic tests that clinicians have at their disposal, there could be advantages in the use of "automated" mathematical/statistical methods.