Medindia

X

Boffins Refute Claims That 'Smoke 23 Times More Toxic in Vehicle Than in Home'

by Tanya Thomas on  April 14, 2010 at 3:06 PM General Health News   - G J E 4
 Boffins Refute Claims That 'Smoke 23 Times More Toxic in  Vehicle Than in Home'
Popular belief that smoking in cars is 23 times more toxic than in other indoor environments is not backed by scientific evidence.
Advertisement

A team of Australian researchers described how a local media report of an unsourced statistic - that 'second-hand smoke was "23 times more toxic in a vehicle than in a home" - led to widespread reporting of the figure in international media and peer-reviewed literature.

Advertisement
However, there appears to be no scientific evidence to support this claim, the researchers said.

"In a subsequent exhaustive search of the relevant literature, we failed to locate any scientific source for this comparison," write Mr. Ross MacKenzie, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Australia and coauthor.

"Given that the issue of banning smoking in cars is gaining traction internationally, use of this media-friendly tobacco control 'fact' presents potential problems of credibility."

The 23 times estimate has evolved from being a brief quotation in a US newspaper to entering the academic mainstream in 1998 when a Tobacco Control editorial closely copied the previous quote. Both the newspaper report and the editorial were then cited in an issue of Nicotine and Tobacco Research.

"The biggest danger of inaccurately interpreting research on smoking in cars for the sake of a snappy media sound bite is to lose favour with an overwhelmingly supportive public and to provide ammunition for opponents of tobacco control," the authors said.

The authors conclude that researchers and organizations should stop using the 23 times more toxic 'fact' because of the lack of evidence in scientific literature.

"Instead, advocating of smoking bans in cars should simply state that exposure to second-hand smoke in cars poses a significant health risk and that vulnerable children who cannot remove themselves from this smoky environment must be protected," the researhcesr said.

The new research has been described in Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Source: ANI
TAN
Advertisement

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

Advertisement
View All