Bloodless And Transfusion-Free Surgery Has Its Benefits-Founder

December 07, 2007 at 5:07 PM Hospital News
  •   Print
  •   Share
  •   Comments
  •  Text 
Bloodless  And Transfusion-Free Surgery Has Its Benefits-Founder
The pioneer of transfusion-free bloodless surgery has revealed just why the technique is so beneficial, especially for patients wary of transfusions or those whose religion does not allow for it.

People such as Jehovah’s Witness patients believe that accepting blood from a source other then themselves defies the scriptural teachings that their religion holds steadfast.

“Jehovah’s Witness patients no longer have to die for want of blood,” says Patricia Ford, MD, a hematologist/oncologist and Medical Director of the Center for Bloodless Medicine and Surgery at Pennsylvania Hospital, part of the PENN Medicine hospital network.

Dr. Ford is one of the pioneers of bloodless surgery and has been teaching its technique to doctor’s around the world. One technique a bloodless surgery can employ is called “cell salvage” in which blood lost during surgery is siphoned from the body, passed through a filter for cleaning and returned to the body.

The physician can also use it during surgery to limit blood loss and to avoid the need for transfusion of blood from sources other than the patient. Originally developed to meet the needs of the Jehovah’s Witness community, bloodless surgery is transfusion-free and is acceptable to Jehovah Witness followers because they are being reinfused with their own blood.

Bloodless surgery and medicine is a viable and life-saving option for these patients and those wary of the safety of the blood supply, and it is safe for a growing number of surgical and medical conditions, except for acute leukaemia and traumatic injury. “Bloodless procedures have proven to be safer than blood transfusion because they help eliminate complications resulting from transfusions such as immunosuppression, infection, diseases from emerging pathogens for which our blood supply is not yet tested,” said Dr. Ford.

Page 1 Page 1 | 2  Next
 Email Email   RSS Feeds RSS Feeds   Print this page Print   Save this page Save   Link Link   Syndicate Syndicate   Comments Comments   Bookmark and Share
 
Comment & Contribute
Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. Comments are normally moderated and are reviewed after they are posted.
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters

Notify me when reply is posted
I agree to the terms and conditions
  
If you have a question about health related issues, you can now post it in our Ask An Expert section on our community website Medwonders.com and get answers from our panel of experts.

guest

08/06/2008

Surgery patients often lose a significant amount of blood that must be replaced with transfused blood products. But several new techniques dramatically minimize or even eliminate the need for such transfusions. While primarily requested for reasons of faith, bloodless health care services offer many other advantages, and are being chosen by a growing number of patients.

http://www.dukehealth.org/HealthLibrary/HealthArticles/transfusionfree_surgery_please



guest

12/11/2007

Isn't it nice that the Watchtower has provided the medical community with millions of mindless guinea pigs for experimentation.



guest

12/09/2007

Blood issue at a glance: The Watchtower leadership of the Jehovah's Witnesses say NO blood, BUT they actually DO ALLOW some blood "fractions". Problem is this variance is so esoteric complicated that by the time special elders appear in the ER with the rule book, the JW patient is at the point of no return,bleeding to death. NOW,they blame the hospital staff for not having a "cell saver" machine instead of the Watchtower leaders who are responsible for making the rules. I was born a 3rd generation Jehovah's Witness in 1957 and endured the Watchtower's no blood commandment with longstanding bleeding Crohn's disease.The Watchtower leadership expects followers to die for their dogma and many have.The medical staff get blamed and are 'damned if they do damned if they don't'. In 20 years there will be artificial blood for anyone who chooses it,putting an end to this drama.



guest

12/09/2007

The Watchtower leaders of the Jehovah's Witnesses are hypocrites they promote no blood while at the same time use many blood fractions. The fact is that elective bloodless surgery advancements are not going to help me if I have trauma and lose much of my blood volume and need an emergency blood transfusion.




X

Medwonders Health Network

  • Health News Index
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
News Archive
Date :
Category :
Keyword :
  • News Quick Links
News Central Health Watch
Latest Health News Health In Focus
News Category (500+) Breaking Health News
Popular News Celebrating Life
Health News and Press Release Medindia - Exclusive
News Photo Gallery India Special
News Video Gallery Lifestyle and Wellness
News From Other Resources
News Categories:  
Women's Health Center

Hospital Related News

» Kochi Floating Hospital Godsend to Locals » Large City Hospitals: Breeding Grounds for MRSA
» Study Says Hospital Readmission Rates Linked to Availability of Care » Review: ICU Stays for Worst Asthma Drop 74 Percent
» CT Scans for ED Patients With Ground Level Fall or Simple Assault Not Necessary » Link Between Expensive Hospital Readmissions and Health-care Associated Infections
» Emergency Surgery Faces Scarcity of Hand Surgeons: Vanderbilt Study » Hospitals Putting Additional Focus on Infection Prevention After Suspension of Additional Funds by Medicare
Read More >>