The Bush administration might have shot itself in the foot by stopping aid to NGOs offering counseling to women on abortion. The number of abortions increased in African countries where U.S. support for NGOs was cut the most, say Stanford researchers.
In sub-Saharan Africa, where NGOs are often the primary provider of family planning services, closing clinics consequent on aid cut only meant women lost access to birth control pills and other modern contraceptives.
AdvertisementThe reduction in the availability of modern contraceptives led women to seek abortions as a form of birth control, it turns out.
"If women use abortion as a substitute for modern contraceptives, then reductions in birth control supply could lead to an increase in abortions," said Grant Miler Miller, an assistant professor of medicine and Stanford Health Policy faculty member. "Regardless of one's view about abortion, this result shows that the policy objectives of neither side are being met."
Originally it was Ronald Reagan who shaped such an anti-abortion policy in 1984, but it was upheld by both Bush administrations. The policy was of course was reversed by Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.
Now Grant Miler and Erab Vebdavid, an affiliate of Stanford Health Policy at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and an assistant professor of medicine have come out with the first quantitative study to examine the implications of the US policy on abortions.
They have and found that the number of women having induced abortions more than doubled between 2001 and 2008 in the African countries most affected by the policy.
Their findings, co-authored with Stanford Medical School student Patrick Avila, were published online Tuesday in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
The researchers focused their study on a sample of 260,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44 living in 20 sub-Saharan countries from 1994 to 2008. The rate of abortions was similar across all the countries while Clinton had rescinded the policy between 1994 and 2000. About 10 in 10,000 women reported having abortions every year during that time.
When Bush reinstated the policy in 2001, abortion rates rose over the next seven years among women living in countries where the impact of the policy was greatest.
"Countries where NGOs were receiving the most U.S. federal money when the policy was overturned saw the biggest spike in abortions when the policy was turned on," Bendavid said. "You were two-and-a-half times more likely to see abortions then."
The policy, dubbed the Mexico City Policy after Reagan announced it during a United Nations population conference held in Mexico's capital, was motivated by a belief that taxpayer money should not pay for abortion-related services. And while the policy's implementation or revocation has been determined along party lines, the Stanford researchers' findings have repercussions beyond the politics of America's perennial abortion debate.
With few exceptions, abortion is illegal in the countries Bendavid and Miller examined. So when a woman has an induced abortion, the procedure is usually unsafe and sometimes deadly.
"The implications for fertility, population and maternal health are substantial," Bendavid said. "Unsafe abortions are among the most lethal complications of pregnancies worldwide."
Beyond the scope of the study, funding restrictions that lead to closure of family planning clinics could create a void in women's health care, leaving fewer options for vaccinations, prenatal support and cervical cancer screenings.
"Our hope is that our findings will enter into the decision-making process when administrations weigh their policies on abortion," Bendavid said. "Regardless of one's view about abortion, this analysis shows that the stakes in this issue transcend political ideology. Effective foreign policy must now consider the implications for maternal health in places where abortion is unsafe."