A Gene Test to Save Your Life- It ‘Prevents’ Heart Disease

by Tanya Thomas on  September 1, 2008 at 8:53 AM Heart Disease News   - G J E 4
 A Gene Test to Save Your Life- It ‘Prevents’ Heart Disease
It's common knowledge how early intervention and treatment saves the heart from considerable damage after a cardiac arrest but there's also an old adage that says- Prevention is better than cure.

When it comes to heart disease, this is what experts seem to be working on. Yes, the pundits of the medical world have developed a genetic test which can help prevent heart disease even before you know its there!

Three Australian experts had called for more support to screen families with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), which involves a defective gene that prevents liver cells from taking up cholesterol from the blood.

The call follows reports that UK authorities may soon recommend at-risk children under the age of 10 years be screened for the FH gene.

"[The UK proposals] represent an approach we would like to see in Australia," ABC online quoted Dr David Sullivan, president of the Australian Atherosclerosis Society, who spoke at a forum organized by the Australian Science Media Centre in Adelaide.

Sullivan says FH affects up to 1 in 500 Australians but only 7percent of people with the condition are adequately treated.

FH increases the chance of early heart attack and stroke and is probably causing about 10 percent of heart attacks in people under age 60, he says.

Sullivan says half of the men with the usual form of FH develop coronary heart disease before they are 50.

He says a genetic test could help identify FH early so people could take action to prevent heart disease - such as improving diet, preventing smoking, or undertaking drug treatment.

Sullivan says the UK has been researching FH for a relatively long time and more work is needed to tailor a screening program to the specific mutations and circumstances relevant to Australia.

Some experts say while prevention is a laudable aim, genetic tests may not necessarily trigger the preventive health measures people expect.

"Overall, logically it sounds beneficial but we already know people have risks of heart disease and are not able to change their behavior," says social scientist Associate Professor Sandra Taylor of Central Queensland University.

"They may not have access to the correct information. They may not be able to afford healthier food," Sandra said.

Source: ANI

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

View All