Confidential medical records of Trillium patients accessed multiple times over four years.
Mississauga businesswoman and Trillium patient Katie Mallinson has alleged that Lyons used her access to Trillium's entire database to secretly review the confidential medical records of Trillium patients for many years and hundreds of times.
The class action characterizes Lyons as an electronic "Peeping Tom", who surreptitiously looked into the private lives of her victims, for her own amusement. Neither Mallinson nor Class Members are current patients of Vettese.
Such records contain highly sensitive and private information about patients' medical histories. For example medications taken, treatments received, operations undergone, the diseases and disorders they may suffer from, and family circumstances, among others.
The claim seeks $2 million in general damages as well as exemplary damages and punitive damages, plus individual awards for class members, costs and interest.
The claim alleges that Trillium's privacy policies and procedures were inadequate, underfunded, and unenforced. It also contends that Dr. Vettese left Lyons to her own devices for hours at a time, and that despite being one of Ontario's top paid physicians he spent neither money nor time protecting the privacy interests of Trillium patients.
The total number of patients affected is not yet known. Lyons was given unrestricted access to every record of every patient the hospital has ever treated. The Hospital's privacy office failed to detect any of Lyon's misconduct, and only began investigating when Ms. Mallinson reported her own suspicions of it.
The claim also alleges that Trillium has conducted only a cursory internal investigation, and asks Ontario's Superior Court to appoint an auditor to determine the full extent of the breach of privacy.
The allegations have not yet been proven in Court.
Trillium has already admitted to Ms. Mallinson that her medical information was improperly accessed by Lyons for at least four years, and says that Lyons herself has acknowledged to it that she did so.
The Plaintiff's counsel is the Mississauga litigation firm of Du Vernet, Stewart, who were successful counsel in the Ontario Court of Appeal case, which established the common law right to privacy in Ontario, Jones v. Tsige.
Potential class action members who have already been advised by Trillium that their privacy has been invaded, or who suspect they have been victim of this privacy breach are asked to contact the firm for more information about the case.
SOURCE DU VERNET, STEWART Barristers and Solicitors
Subscribe to our Free Newsletters!
Breathing in unclean air due to increasing air pollution could cause kidney damage with resultant ...
Benign prostatic hyperplasia or enlarged prostate is a noncancerous condition observed in men above ...
Urinary retention is a condition where a person is unable to voluntarily empty the urinary bladder ...View All